'Duck Dynasty' Star Is Rosa Parks Of Our Generation, Says GOP Candidate Ian Bayne

It seems like the entire Republican Party has had something to say about the suspension of  Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson after he made some, uh, choice comments about gay people, bestiality, and genitals. Now, wannabe Republicans are getting involved, too: GOP congressional candidate Ian Bayne of Illinois sent a fundraising e-mail to supporters Wednesday comparing Phil Robertson to Rosa Parks. Yes, that's right, Rosa Parks, matriarch of the civil-rights movement. Rosa Parks: just like the hairy old dude from Duck bloody Dynasty.

Who, by the way, told GQ: “It seems like, to me, a vagina — as a man — would be more desirable than a man’s anus.” Oh, and, "Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men ... They won't inherit the kingdom of God."

Oh, Ian Bayne, just ... no. We know you're trying to get the GOP's attention, but it might have been better to just play the "endangered free speech" card the GOP has pulled over and over since Robertson's suspension from the show.

From the e-mail Bayne's campaign sent to supporters:

Perhaps a more appropriate comparison to Rosa Parks in 2013 would be, oh, we don't know, Malala Yousafzai. Or, really, anyone who doesn't star on Duck Dynasty, a show self-described on A&E as about "the family that runs the duck call fabrication business."

We can't even. Just no.

On the bright side, maybe Bayne's (kind of hilarious) idiocy will stop any more GOP members from piping up again (that's you, Sarah Palin) to defend this supposed violation of free speech, which this incident apparently proves is under threat. As Bustle reported yesterday, the GOP has been trying to defend the homophobic Duck Dynasty star all week using the faulty claim that his free speech is being violated.

What these politicians forget — or perhaps don’t understand in the first place — is that this isn’t a First Amendment issue at all. As Josh Barro writes over at Business Insider, “no clause in the First Amendment establishes a right to star in a reality show on A&E regardless of what you say to GQ about vaginas and anuses.”

In fact, if anyone is protected by the First Amendment, it’s A&E, whose choice to not air a reality show starring a man who might alienate viewership falls pretty well under First Amendment rights.

Rachel Jarrell on YouTube

Yeah, just like Rosa Parks.