Can Dudes Who Give "Bro-Jobs" Still Be Straight?

Yes, you read that right: straight white male sexual fluidity. Author Jane Ward explores the once-unheard-of idea in her new book Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men , where she explains that the common "bro-job" (aka when guys who identify as straight hook up with other guys who identify is straight) is not an indicator of future gay identity, but rather a way for straight white men to greet, grapple with, and ultimately reinforce their straightness, whiteness, and maleness.

Think about it: straight women can smooch other women (or even go for more than smooches) without being categorically labeled as lesbians for doing it. In fact, the fetishization of femme-on-femme action by straight men actually encourages straight women to play with other (important: feminine, straight, and therefore non-threatening to men) women without threatening their straightness.

It's even possible that this lack of stigmatization, albeit for a very specific type of girl-on-girl interaction, leads women to more freely self-report when they experience sexual attraction toward other women, which results in studies definitively declaring that women experience greater "erotic plasticity" than men, whose sexual orientation tends to remain fixed.

What if the truth is that straight men experience, or could experience, just as much sexual fluidity as straight women, but the act of dude-on-dude sexytime is so stigmatized that they fail to self-report these feelings or desires when they bubble up?

Since being a straight white male is such a comfortable default in society, it can be more difficult for them to examine, question, challenge, or critique their identities, unless they feel an overpowering and all-encompassing pull toward identifying as another gender or sexual orientation.

But, as Ward's book demonstrates, straight white men engage in "gay" sexual behaviors all the time. From NYU Press's release:

"There’s fraternity and military hazing rituals, where new recruits are made to grab each other’s penises and stick fingers up their fellow members’ anuses; online personal ads, where straight men seek other straight men to masturbate with; and, last but not least, the long and clandestine history of straight men frequenting public restrooms for sexual encounters with other men."

Or, you know, the casual post-game locker room bro-job, which is totally not gay at all.

But here's the thing — it really isn't gay. What's gay is being gay. And ultimately, dudes who defensively bark "no homo" to quash any possibility that their actions might be perceived as gay only perpetuate the notion that anyone who is that cagey about it must "secretly" be gay. The truth is, being cagey about it probably just means you've never really, earnestly examined your sexual identity, because the possibility of giving up your straight privilege is too uncomfortable to fathom.

But again, being gay is what makes you gay. So that weird defensiveness is kind of ruining fluidity for the guys who identify as straight, fool around with a guy, and then authentically continue to identify as straight, which is totally legitimate, unlike hastily declaring "no homo" after accidentally touching thighs when sitting next to each other on a couch.

"In the end, Ward’s analysis offers a new way to think about heterosexuality," the press release continues, "not as the opposite or absence of homosexuality, but as its own unique mode of engaging in homosexual sex, a mode characterized by pretense, dis-identification and racial and heterosexual privilege."

Want more of Bustle's Sex and Relationships coverage? Check out our new podcast, I Want It That Way, which delves into the difficult and downright dirty parts of a relationship, and find more on our Soundcloud page.

Image: ViewApart/Fotolia