How To Figure Out What Neil Gorsuch Actually Thinks About Abortion
President Trump made some pretty strong campaign promises to appeal to conservative voters, including a vow to nominate a Supreme Court justice who would overturn Roe v. Wade. Trump's pick to fill the vacancy on the bench, Neil Gorsuch, began his confirmation hearings on March 20, and as you can expect, he was extensively grilled on the topic. While he was forced to answer questions specifically pertaining to the landmark 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide, Gorsuch's comments about abortion, both in the confirmation hearings and in past statements, make it difficult to know what his views on the subject really are.
Gorsuch cautiously tip-toed around the question of whether or not he would work to overturn Roe, as Trump repeatedly promised he would, by stating in his confirmation hearing that he would honor the precedent set by the ruling. But in the past, he has expressed a firm commitment to protecting the inviolability of human life by opposing assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Roe v. Wade has ensured for decades that women across the country have access to safe abortion procedures. While state-wide laws that attempt to restrict access to abortion are ubiquitous, a nation-wide repeal of Roe v. Wade would affect more than 37 million women, according to a report by the Center for Reproductive Rights.
A lot is riding on this Supreme Court pick, most notably women's fundamental right to have autonomy over their own reproductive decisions. That being said, Gorsuch's past comments on the subject will surely be subject to scrutiny. Here are a few of his most notable comments:
6Human Life Is Inherently Valuable
Despite the polished and carefully constructed answers Gorsuch gave in his confirmation hearing, his book,The Future Of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, provides insight into Gorsuch's views on whether or not it is ever acceptable to end a human life, even in extreme circumstances. While his book focuses specifically on euthanasia, his philosophies reveal a lot about how Gorsuch may apply the same logic to abortion rights cases.
(Note the always.)
7Abortion Rights Dependent On Definition Of Human Life
Also in his book, Gorsuch analyzes whether or not abortions violate the dignity of human life, but was still careful not to reveal his own personal opinion. In one chapter of the book, he provides a standard for determining the ethicality of abortions.
He wrote that under the current precedent established by Roe v. Wade, "a fetus is not a person," but in a footnote later in the book, Gorsuch also presents a contrary view provided by a mentor of his, Justice Byron R. White.
Gorsuch does not explain his own view on the topic, but knowing the standard he is using to determine a woman's right to abortion is telling.
8Protect Religious Beliefs
In 2013, Gorsuch ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby's right to deny providing certain types of contraceptives to employees through insurance coverage on the basis of protecting the company's "religious beliefs."
This logic used in this ruling could, potentially, be used to restrict access to abortion because it is strongly opposed by many religious organizations.
With more confirmation hearings ahead, we can be sure that Gorsuch will continue to be asked about his stance on abortion and, specifically, whether or not he plans to overturn Roe v. Wade. These quotes offer a good starting point for attempting to analyze what Gorsuch's personal views on the subject are — although that still isn't entirely clear.