'Making A Murderer's Ken Kratz Explains What He Thinks The Show Got Wrong

Share

If you're one of the millions of people who got sucked into the engrossing Netflix documentary series Making a Murderer a couple of years ago ― it debuted back in November of 2015 ― there's a good chance you're eagerly anticipating the follow-up series from filmmakers Moira Demos and Laura Ricciardi, which is due out sometime this year. Which is why it's no surprise that a familiar face from the first series is making his case against Avery now: Making a Murderer's Ken Kratz has a new book coming out, arguing for Avery's guilt in the high-profile murder of Teresa Halbach.

Kratz, who was the district attorney for Wisconsin's Calumet County for 18 years before being resigning in 2010, has long had no patience for theories about Avery's innocence. He's appeared on more than one TV news show since the release of the first series, giving his take on why the once wrongfully-convicted Avery actually did commit the crime this time around, and why he believes that his nephew, Brendan Dassey, should also spend the bulk of his life behind bars.

As Wisconsin ABC affiliate WBAY detailed, Kratz argues that the case Demos and Ricciardi put forward is allegedly misleading.

These arguments are tackled in Kratz's new book on the subject, titled Avery: The Case Against Steven Avery and What "Making a Murderer" Gets Wrong. The book was released on Tuesday, Feb. 21, and is currently for sale. While you'll have to take a look at it to learn Kratz's full argument, a few released excerpts have teased out some of his takes.

For instance, as he's insisted publicly since the series came out, he's particularly upset by the portrayal of the discovery of the infamous vial of Avery's blood, arguing that the box it was in was opened during his 2002 appeal of his earlier wrongful rape conviction, and was not an indication of alleged tampering. Furthermore, Kratz alleges that the hole in the vial's stopper was made by a nurse when the blood was being inserted, not an investigator scheming to plant evidence, as the documentary suggested it could be.

Kratz is also unconvinced by the advocacy for Dassey, whose conviction was overturned late last year (although he still sits in prison pending an appeal by the state).

Here's a quote in which he tackles the issue, saying that it was "not my fault" that Dassey had a low IQ, a fact which his advocates say allowed investigators to isolate him and coerce him into making a false confession.

Suffice to say, Kratz ― whose career as a district attorney ended after it was revealed he'd sent lewd texts to a domestic abuse victim, and subsequently underwent treatment for drug addiction and narcissistic personality disorder ― is doing everything he can to voice his certainty of both Avery and Dassey's guilt. There's no specific date yet announced for the second series on Avery, but it's sure to stir up these issues all over again.