Wall Street Mothers and Stay-At-Home Fathers Doesn't Spell Work-Life Balance

Nannies, daycare, and workplace flexibility are so 2004. If you really want to have kids and a fulfilling career, get yourself a stay-at-home husband. At least according to The New York Times, this seems to be the only solution. Because only "as husbands do domestic duty" are these women "free to achieve." The root of the problem is the long work hours and intense competition the financial world requires:

Many [couples] discovered that even with babysitting and household help, the demands of working in finance made a two-career marriage impossible.

Wall Street, are you paying attention? This is not the right way to get to gender equality and, you know, general sanity. Most American families aren't raking in six figures and can't afford to have only one parent in the workforce.

This piece is a pretty interesting insight into the lives of a select — very select — few, and explores how couples in these untraditional arrangements deal with traditional gender roles. But, unsurprisingly, The New York Times is more than a little worried about how this choice makes men feel — as if women haven't had to deal with this since the dawn of time — and the article doesn't really seem to ask whether there are solutions to this exhausting and not always fulfilling arrangement:

Sound like Mad Men, much? No one wants these men to be the new Betty Friedans. The ideal workforce would be one in which everyone has the opportunity to pursue a fulfilling career. This means flexible hours, equal pay, and affordable child care. Because having it all shouldn't require having a spouse staying at home to do it all.

Image: Don LaVange/Flickr