5 Times Hillary Clinton's Style Was Criticized Instead Of Her Ideas
Whether you're a Hillary supporter or not, I think we can all agree that the criticism Hillary Clinton has faced for her style choices is utterly ridiculous. Clinton is constantly receiving flack for her lack of "feminine" dress, her past penchant for hair scrunchies, and those rare occasions she chooses to go out in public without a full face of makeup. What I just can't wrap my head around, even more than the ageist comments and the general sexism Hillary is constantly having to endure, is why Hillary Clinton's love of pantsuits is such an issue for the media. Has anyone ever cared about what male politicians have worn, as long as it wasn't sweatpants or Speedos? Well, I Googled "male presidential candidates who were criticized for their clothes" to find out.
And, guess what? Even in that search, the very first article that popped up managed to criticize Hillary Clinton's "ponytail phase" within the first 300 words. Clearly, if you're a woman in politics, it's not enough to just be qualified and passionate about the future of your country and its people. Apparently, you have to be deemed "fashionable" too. At least, you do if you're Hillary Clinton. Here are five enraging times Hillary Clinton has been criticized for her outfits instead of her ideas.
1. That Time Jimmy Fallon Tried to Be Funny And Failed (2014)
I love, love, love Jimmy Fallon. But when he cracked that joke last year about Chelsea Clinton's then future child's wardrobe saying, "If it's a girl, it will get some of Chelsea's old hand-me-downs, and if it's a boy, it will get some of Hillary's," he deserved all those boos his audience chose to give him.
2. That Time When Tim Gunn Said Hillary Was "Confused About Her Gender" (2011)
I have always had great respect and admiration for Project Runway's Tim Gunn, but after learning about the sexist comments he made about Hillary's pantsuits back when he was a guest on Lopez Tonight in 2011, he definitely dropped down several notches in my esteem.
Why he felt the need to knock Hillary's pantsuits by saying, "Why must she dress that way? I think she's confused about her gender!" I will never understand. Since when does a woman liking pantsuits translate to gender confusion? Ladies have been wearing pants for quite some time now, and as a fashion icon, I would have thought Tim was aware of that.
3. That Time When Editor Kate Betts Complained That Hillary Wears Pantsuits Just To 'Fit In' (2010)
Back in 2010 Kate Betts, a contributing editor to Time with a notable career in fashion magazines such as Vogue and Harper's Bazaar, and author of Everyday Icon: Michelle Obama and the Power of Style, wrote in her then-new style column for The Daily Beast that she felt Hillary's pantsuits were just a way to blend in. Betts wrote:
First of all, I see her point, but who cares if she does want to blend in? And secondly, she obviously doesn't wear them just for camouflage. Rather, many of her pantsuits are quite colorful. See Exhibit A:
And, Exhibit C:
4. That Time Harper's Bazaar Compiled A Gallery Of 35 Outfit Suggestions For Hillary And Titled it, "Dressing Mrs. President" (2008)
Although this article may have been written with good intentions, it's honestly just incredibly insulting throughout. Whether Robin Givhan intended it or not, compiling a gallery for Harper's Bazaar of 35 suggested outfits — which were then photoshopped onto Hillary's body, complete with "tips on how to get ready on day one" — is pretty blatantly sexist. Additionally, it's hard to buy that the article was written strictly as helpful advice (which Hillary didn't ask for) when it pokes fun at Hillary's pantsuits within the first three paragraphs:
The condescension continues throughout with lines such as, "I have faith that the senator from New York — should she be handed the keys to the Oval Office — will find the right style." Why should Hillary have to find the "right" style if/when she makes it to the Oval Office? I understand the need for our nation's leader to look professional, but it has never been the Commander in Chief's job to represent our nation's fashion sense, and that shouldn't change based on our leader's gender.
5. That Time When The Washington Post Ran An Entire Article About Hillary's Pantsuits (2007)
Once again, Robin Givhan:
In all fairness, about halfway through the article Givhan did ask the question, "Is even considering the senator's clothes a kind of chauvinistic assault?" To which the answer is, as far as this writer is concerned, a resounding YES. But, sentences later, the nonsense continues:
The fact that it is 2015 and our culture still focuses this much on what female candidates are wearing instead of their past achievements and future goals is just one of the many reasons I can't wait to cast my vote for Hillary. But as frustrating as all this blatant sexism is, it's good to know HRC is making pantsuit jokes instead of letting criticism get her down.